How to Contest a Will Under Family Law Provisions

The loss of a loved one often brings grief and emotional strain, but it can also lead to disputes over the division of their estate. In many families, disagreements arise over the content of a will, particularly if it appears to be unfair or unexpected. While it is widely believed that a will is final, it is important to note that, under specific circumstances and in accordance with the law in England & Wales, it is possible to challenge its validity or the fairness of its provisions. This process, however, is not without complexity. Understanding the nuances and legal steps involved is crucial if you are considering taking this course of action.

 

Who Can Challenge a Will?

Not everyone has the legal standing to contest a will. In England & Wales, only those who have a vested interest in the estate—such as a spouse, civil partner, child, or a person financially dependent on the deceased—are typically eligible to make a claim. Beneficiaries named in the disputed will, beneficiaries under a previous will, or individuals who would inherit under intestacy rules (laws governing inheritance in the absence of a valid will) may also challenge it.

If you fall into one of these categories and believe that the deceased’s final testament is incorrect, unfair, or invalid, you may have grounds to contest it. However, proving your case will depend on the reasons you are challenging the will and the evidence you can provide.

 

Grounds for Contesting a Will

There are several legal grounds upon which a will can be contested in England & Wales, ranging from questions about its validity to claims under family provision laws. Each ground has its own requirements, and pursuing them requires careful consideration of both legal and practical issues.

Lack of Testamentary Capacity

For a will to be valid, the person who made it (the “testator”) must have had the mental capacity to do so at the time it was created. The legal standard for testamentary capacity is defined by the 1870 case of *Banks v Goodfellow*, which states that a testator must:

1. Understand the nature and consequences of making a will.
2. Be aware of the extent of their property.
3. Comprehend and appreciate any claims they should consider when distributing their assets.

If you can demonstrate that the testator lacked this capacity—perhaps due to a mental health condition such as dementia or Alzheimer’s—at the time of making the will, you might succeed in challenging its validity. Medical records, witness statements, and expert opinions are often used as evidence in such cases.

 

Lack of Proper Formalities

Wills must comply with specific formalities under the *Wills Act 1837*. For example, the will must be in writing, signed by the testator, and witnessed by two independent witnesses who are present simultaneously. If any of these requirements are not met, the will may be deemed invalid. This is one of the more straightforward grounds upon which a will can be contested, as it usually relies on factual evidence rather than subjective interpretation.

 

Undue Influence or Coercion

A will can be contested if it is believed that the testator was pressured, coerced, or unduly influenced into making certain decisions that did not reflect their true intentions. Proving undue influence can be challenging, as it often requires strong evidence that someone manipulated the testator for their own gain. Common signs include sudden or significant deviations from previous wills, involvement of a specific individual in writing or amending the will, and changes made when the testator was vulnerable.

 

Fraudulent or Forged Wills

If there is evidence that the will was forged or that the signature on it is fraudulent, the document will not stand up in court as the deceased’s valid last testament. Document analysis by handwriting or forensic experts is often employed in these cases. Similarly, if someone has created a will by fraudulent means or misrepresented certain facts to the testator, this could also render the document void.

 

Reasonable Financial Provision Claims

Even if a will is valid, it can still be challenged under the *Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975* if it fails to make “reasonable financial provision” for certain people. This statute allows close family members or dependants who were left out of a will or insufficiently provided for to make a claim against the estate. Spouses, civil partners, children (including adult children), and other financial dependants are eligible to bring such claims. Courts will consider factors such as the size of the estate, the claimant’s financial needs, and the relationship between the claimant and the deceased when deciding whether to make adjustments to the inheritance.

 

The Role of Mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution

Before taking a case to court, it is often worth pursuing mediation or alternative dispute resolution (ADR) to resolve disagreements over a will. Mediation involves an independent third party helping those involved in the dispute to reach a mutually acceptable resolution. This method can save significant time, costs, and emotional stress compared to litigation.

While mediation is not mandatory in disputes over wills, courts generally encourage it and may penalise parties who unreasonably refuse to engage in ADR. Experienced mediators in family law and inheritance matters can help facilitate constructive dialogue, explore creative solutions, and reduce animosity among family members.

 

Initiating Court Proceedings

If mediation proves unsuccessful, the case may need to proceed to court. To challenge the validity of a will, you will typically need to apply to the Probate Registry to enter a “caveat,” which temporarily prevents the grant of probate while the dispute is being resolved. If the issue concerns reasonable financial provision under the *Inheritance Act*, you must file your claim within six months from the date of the grant of probate or letters of administration.

During the proceedings, your legal team will gather evidence, interview witnesses, and present your case, which may involve expert testimony, medical records, or forensic analysis. It is important to understand that bringing a claim to court can be both costly and stressful. There is no guarantee of success, and losing may result in being ordered to pay the other party’s legal costs.

 

Practical Considerations and Costs

Before contesting a will, it is essential to weigh the potential benefits against the risks and costs involved. Legal fees can escalate quickly, especially if the dispute is prolonged. Moreover, challenging a will can create or exacerbate tensions within a family. It is wise to seek expert legal advice early on to assess the strength of your case and discuss alternative options.

In some cases, conditional fee agreements (known as “no win, no fee”) may be available. However, these are often only offered in strong cases where your solicitor believes there is a high likelihood of success. Nonetheless, you should be prepared for the possibility of a lengthy court battle and the financial strain this could entail.

 

Seeking Legal Advice

Navigating the legal process of contesting a will can be daunting. Consulting a solicitor specialising in contested probate or family law is crucial to understanding your rights, the strength of your claim, and the best course of action. They can help you decide whether to proceed, gather the necessary evidence, and guide you through the complexities of the legal system. Additionally, they can advise on alternative funding arrangements, if applicable.

Experienced legal professionals will also help you maintain a pragmatic approach. Contesting a will should not be undertaken lightly and requires a strong, evidence-based case to stand a chance of success. While emotions often run high in such disputes, your solicitor can provide objective guidance to ensure that you make informed decisions.

 

Final Thoughts

Disputing a loved one’s will is never an easy task, either legally or emotionally. However, in England & Wales, there are clear legal frameworks in place to address situations where a will may not reflect the true intentions of the deceased, or where it fails to provide reasonable financial provision for certain individuals. Whether you suspect undue influence, fraud, a lack of testamentary capacity, or you have been unfairly excluded from inheritance, it is important to follow the appropriate legal procedures and seek professional advice.

Exploring alternative resolution methods, such as mediation, may resolve the dispute without the need for protracted court battles. Whatever path you choose, acting promptly and enlisting the support of experienced legal counsel will ensure that your case is handled with care and professionalism. While no legal outcome can eliminate the emotional strain of such conflicts, it is possible to achieve a fair resolution that respects both your rights and the memory of the deceased.

Leave a Reply